The Effect of Rehabilitation Exercises Using DRX9000 Spinal Decompression Device on the Rehabilitation of Lower Back Pain in Athletes Who Use Wheelchairs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/jpo.v3i1.2150Keywords:
Rehabilitation Exercises, Low Back Pain, Disabled AthletesAbstract
Sports injuries are considered a significant issue for athletes in general and for individuals with disabilities in particular, as they represent a major factor affecting the physical performance of disabled individuals who engage in sports and physical activities. People with disabilities already experience limitations and reduced mobility due to their impairments, which increases their risk of injury during physical activity, whether from improper movements or actions that exceed their natural physical capacity. One common injury among wheelchair users in various sports is lower back pain, characterized by the onset of pain and limited mobility in the lumbar region. This condition can impede athletic performance, leading to temporary cessation of sports activities until the pain subsides. Recurrent episodes may result in complications or more severe injuries. Even minor lower back pain, if not addressed with appropriate medical and therapeutic measures, can develop into a serious condition. Through a review of existing literature, the researcher observed that current rehabilitation and treatment programs for lower back injuries may not adequately meet the specific needs of individuals with disabilities. Therefore, the researcher designed a set of exercises tailored to the physical capabilities of wheelchair users, incorporating the programmed spinal traction device (DRX9000) and additional assistive tools, under the supervision of a specialized orthopedic physician and physiotherapy experts.
References
Abdul Malah, F., et al. (2011). Sports training for second-stage students. Amman: Arab Society Library for Publishing and Distribution.
Abdul-Majid Ibrahim, M. (2002). Volleyball for physically disabled – sitting. Amman: Al-Warraq Publishing and Distribution.
Abdul-Tarfi, A. S. (2013). Applied tests in physical education: Motor, physical, and skill assessments. Baghdad: Dar Al-Kutub wa Al-Watha’iq.
Abu Al-Raz, H. (1989). Effect of a proposed physical exercise program on some motor abilities and postural deviations of physically disabled individuals (Unpublished PhD thesis). Helwan University, Faculty of Physical Education.
Al-Kinani, A. K. (2009). Introduction to statistics and applications with SPSS. Baghdad: Dar Al-Dhia Printing House.
Al-Sayed Youssef, M. (1998). Studies on problems of sports medicine. Alexandria: Al-Ishaa Technical Library and Press.
Al-Talib, N., & Al-Samarrai, M. (1987). Principles of statistics and physical and sports tests. University of Mosul: Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing.
Baranidharan, G. (2024). 24-month outcomes of indirect decompression using a minimally invasive interspinous fixation device versus standard open direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A prospective comparison. Journal of Pain Research, 17, 2079–2097. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S453343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S453343
Dalton, E. (2005). Advanced myoskeletal techniques. Oklahoma City, OK: Freedom From Pain Institutes.
Guzmán, A. M. Diago. (2025). Not surgical manage of discal hernia with the DRX9000 in Portoviejo, Ecuador. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 24. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105014808321&origin=inward
Hasan, S. (2020). Interspinous and interlaminar devices for decompression. In Minimally invasive spine surgery: Surgical techniques and disease management (pp. 189–199). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19007-1_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19007-1_18
Hassan Hussein, Q., & Naseef, A. A. (1980). Science of sports training. Mosul: Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing.
Kumar, N. (2023). Evaluating 5-year outcomes of interlaminar devices as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. European Spine Journal, 32(4), 1367–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07610-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07610-x
Li, H. (2025). Treatment of spinal cervical spondylosis with ‘Uni-C’ device and anterior cervical discectomy and decompression fusion. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 35(5), 675–676. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.05.675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.05.675
Pennington, Z. (2024). Decompression alone versus interspinous/interlaminar device placement for degenerative lumbar pathologies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery, 185, 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.054
Poliwoda, S. (2022). A minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedure after an interspinous spacer device implantation: An uncommon order of treatment with a successful outcome. Orthopedic Reviews, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.35844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.35844
Schenck, C. D. (2022). Interspinous process device versus conventional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 36(6), 909–917. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21419
Yassin, W., & Abdul-Abidi, H. M. (1996). Statistical applications in physical education research. Mosul: Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing.
Zhang, Y. (2021). Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 26, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003
Zhu, C. (2024). Efficacy and safety of interspinous process device compared with alone decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine United States, 103(23). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038370
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
