Taboo in Sasak Language Spoken in Kopang Rembiga Village

Fitriani Lestari; I Gede Budasi; Kadek Sintya Dewi

doi:10.47134/jpbi.v1i2.275

Authors

Fitriani Lestari Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
I Gede Budasi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Kadek Sintya Dewi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jpbi.v1i2.275

Keywords:

Taboo words, Sasak Language, Sociolinguistics

Abstract

In order to avoid the extinction of Sasak Language, it is important for young generation of Sasak to maintain the existence of the language spoken in Kopang Rembiga Village. The objectives of this study are; to find out taboo words, taboo forms, and their references. The researchers were the main instruments in this study and the other additional instrument was an interview guide. The data collection technique was in-depth interview. Three types of data in the study were analyzed as follows: for taboo words were analyzed descriptively based on 3 domains in Tri Hita Karana concept, the forms of taboo words were analyzed using the theory of Frazer (1955) and Montagu (1973), and the references of taboo words were analyzed using the theory suggested by Laksana (2009). The results of the study are as follows: 1) there were 31 taboo words spoken in this village connecting with Tri Hita Karana concepts. The concepts consist to 3 domains of Parahyangan (living harmony with God); 1 word, Pawongan (living harmony with people); 22 words, and Palemahan (living harmony with nature); 8 words. 2) there are 23 taboo forms included in the taboo on names and words and also there are 8 taboo forms included to taboo on swearing words. 3) from the 31 words, there are 13 references of related to; parents name, animal name, god’s name, people name, peo6ple name who died, name of relatives, mentioning genitals, sexual activity, specific profession, bodily function, wisdom of ruler, nature, illness, name of spirits, personal pronouns, and specific activity.

References

Alwasilah, Chaedar A. (2002). Pokok Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.Anggraini, N. A., Mahyuni, & Burhanuddin. (2022). Bentuk Dan Penggunaan Bahasa Tabu Pada Anak Di Lingkungan Bertais Kota Mataram . 8(3). https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v8i2.3556/http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JIMEBlommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511845307Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v8i3.3556

Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139106856

Dash, R. K., & Phil, M. (2019). What is Ecolinguistics? In India’s Higher Education Authority UGC Approved List of Journals Serial Number (Vol. 19, Issue 5). www.languageinindia.com

Fishman, J. (2009). Language Maintenance And Language Shift As A Field Of Inquiry. A Definition Of The Field And Suggestions For Its Further Development. , 2(9), 32-70. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1964.2.9.32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1964.2.9.32

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-607.

Guion, L. A. (2002). Triangulation: establishing the validity of qualitative studies. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 1-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fy394-2002

Hakiky, L. R. (2018). A Study Of Taboo Expressions Used Among Meno-Mene Dialect Speakers Of Sasak In Praya Journal English Department Faculty Of Teacher Training And Education Mataram University 2018.

Heale, R., & Forbes, D. (2013). Understanding triangulation in research. Research Gates, 97-100. DOI: 10.1136/eb-2013-101494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101494

Hogan-Brun, G., & O’Rourke B. (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Languages and Communities.United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54066-9

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833057

Hughes, G., & Hayashi, M. (2011). Introduction: Taboo language in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 1-3.

Mahayana, I. M. A., Winaya, M. D., Suarjaya, A. A. G., & Saskara, I. G. S. H. (2022). Penggunaan Ungkapan Tabu Di Desa Tenganan Pegringsingan: Kajian Sosio-Pragmatik. LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 19(2), 122-136.

Masitha, P. (2016). Sociolinguistics Analysis of Taboo Language in Internet Meme. Seminar Nasional Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya (SEMNAS KBSP) IV 2016.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Nadia, G. 2013. A Sociolinguistic View of Taboo Language and Euphemisms in the Algerian Society: Attitudes and Beliefs in Tlemcen Speech Community.Tlemcen University

Romaine, S. (2000). Language in society: An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198731924.001.0001

Sidiq, U., Choiri, M., & Mujahidin, A. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif di bidang pendidikan. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1-228.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabet.

Suliadi. (2023). The Taboo Of Sexual Relationship In Sasak Culture: A Study Of Antropological Linguistics Tabu Ihwal Hubungan Seksual Dalam Kebudayaan Masyarakat Sasak: Kajian Linguistik Antropologi Suliadi. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v7i1.955

Syarifaturrahman, Wahyu K., et al. "The Inflection of Sasak Language in Kuripan Village." International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 1, no. 3, 31 Dec. 2017, pp. 155-181, doi:10.29332/ijssh.v1n3.69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n3.69

Tarigan, K. E. ., & Dwi Widayati. (2021). An Approach Of Ecolinguistic In Minyak Karo Based On Ethnobotany. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 1(4), 108–120.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2021). An introduction to sociolinguistics (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Wawan, M. (2020). Analisis Bahasa Tabu Dalam Tradisi Masyarakat Lombok Di Desa Geres Kecamatan Labuhan Haji. https://DOI:10.36312/jime.v8i2.3556/http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JIME