Internet Integration Improves 4C Competencies and Basic Automotive Learning Achievement with SKKNI Standards Through Classroom Action Research

Deni Puji Setiawan; Fuad Abdillah; Budiyanto Budiyanto

doi:10.47134/ptk.v3i4.2710

Authors

Deni Puji Setiawan Ivet University
Fuad Abdillah Ivet University
Budiyanto Ivet University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ptk.v3i4.2710

Keywords:

Vocational Education, 4C Competencies, SKKNI, CClassroom Action Research, Digital Literacy

Abstract

Vocational education demands graduates who master technical competencies according to industry standards alongside 21st-century global skills. However, conventional learning that fails to optimize digital literacy often leaves students passive and yields low performance in work safety materials. This study aims to analyze the role of internet integration in improving the 4Cs global competence and SKKNI-based learning achievement of vocational students in Automotive Basic Work. This research employed a Classroom Action Research design conducted across three stages: pre-cycle, cycle I, and cycle II. The subjects comprised 35 class X TKRO students at SMK Ma'arif NU Doro, selected via purposive sampling. Data were collected through performance observations, assessments, and teacher evaluations, then analyzed using percentage techniques against an 85% classical completeness indicator. The results demonstrated a significant increase in average 4C competency from 30% to 90%, while SKKNI learning completeness rose from 20% to 86% by cycle II. Structured internet integration effectively transforms gadgets into productive learning instruments that simultaneously strengthen 21st-century skills and industrial work competency standards. These findings offer a practical pedagogical model for vocational teachers to align digital learning with the demands of graduate job readiness in the modern industrial world.

References

Abina, A., Batkovič, T., Cestnik, B., Kikaj, A., Kovačič Lukman, R., Kurbus, M., & Zidanšek, A. (2022). Decision Support Concept for Improvement of Sustainability-Related Competences. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148539

Amadi, A. S. M. (2023). Pendidikan di Era Global: Persiapan Siswa untuk Menghadapi Dunia yang Semakin Kompetitif. Educatio, 17(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v17i2.9439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v17i2.9439

Bacalja, A., Beavis, C., & O’Brien, A. (2022). Shifting landscapes of digital literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00019-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00019-x

Benita, F., Virupaksha, D., Wilhelm, E., & Tunçer, B. (2021). A smart learning ecosystem design for delivering Data-driven Thinking in STEM education. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00153-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00153-y

Cavanagh, T. M., & Kiersch, C. (2023). Using commonly-available technologies to create online multimedia lessons through the application of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10181-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10181-1

Daniela, L. (2021). Smart Pedagogy as a Driving Wheel for Technology ‑ Enhanced Learning. 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09536-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09536-z

Gajdzik, B., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Smart Production Workers in Terms of Creativity and Innovation: The Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020068

Geven, S., & Spörlein, C. (2023). Who benefits from school-to-work linkages in the labour market? A comparison between natives, migrants educated abroad, and those educated domestically. European Sociological Review, 39(3), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac038

Hassan, R. H., Hassan, M. T., Naseer, S., Khan, Z., & Jeon, M. (2021). ICT Enabled TVET Education: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 9(07), 81624–81650. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085910

Hefter, M. H. (2023). Web-Based Training and the Roles of Self-Explaining, Mental Effort, and Smartphone Usage. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(3), 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09563-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09563-w

Laura I. G. Perez, & Maria S. R. Montoya. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 35, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6

Peng, R., Razak, R. A., & Halili, S. H. (2023). Investigating the factors affecting ICT integration of in-service teachers in Henan Province, China: structural equation modeling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01871-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01871-z

Pham, Q. D., Dao, N. N., Nguyen-Thanh, T., Cho, S., & Pham, H. C. (2021). Detachable Web-Based Learning Framework to Overcome Immature ICT Infrastructure Toward Smart Education. IEEE Access, 9, 34951–34961. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062371

Rötkönen, E., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Goagoses, N., Zaman, T., Itenge, H., Tan, D. Y. W., & Sutinen, E. (2022). Creating Smart Connected Learning Ecosystems: A Hybrid Model for Design-Based Learning. Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 52, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-052-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-052-005

Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., & Grebski, W. (2022). Knowledge and Skills Development in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies: Interviews of Experts from Pennsylvania State of the USA. Energies, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15072677

Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. de C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà-Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955

Tani, M., Manuguerra, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Can videos affect learning outcomes? Evidence from an actual learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1675–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10147-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10147-3

Tyson, L. D., & Zysman, J. (2022). Automation, AI & Work. 256–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01914

Walidayni, C. T., Dellyana, D., & Chaldun, E. R. (2023). Towards SDGs 4 and 8: How Value Co-Creation Affecting Entrepreneurship Education’ s Quality and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054458

Wang, C. (2022). Comprehensively Summarizing What Distracts Students from Online Learning: A Literature Review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1483531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1483531

Wohlfart, O., & Wagner, I. (2023). Teachers’ role in digitalizing education: an umbrella review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0