Strengthening the Role of the State Language as a Unifying Factor of Interethnic Harmony
The Case of the Republic of Uzbekistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/ptk.v3i1.2320Keywords:
State Language, Interethnic Harmony, Language Policy, Social Cohesion, Multilingual SocietyAbstract
This study aims to investigate the role of the state language in fostering interethnic harmony and social cohesion in a multilingual society. The research focuses on language policy implementation, linguistic integration, and the relationship between language use and civic unity. A qualitative analytical method was employed through policy analysis, sociolinguistic literature review, and examination of national language regulations. The findings demonstrate that the promotion of the state language strengthens national identity and facilitates social integration while maintaining respect for linguistic diversity. Nevertheless, challenges related to unequal language proficiency and minority inclusion persist. The study concludes that balanced language policies integrating state language development with multicultural principles are crucial for sustaining interethnic harmony.
References
Address of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev to the Oliy Majlis. // “Xalq so‘zi”, January 25, 2020.
Anderson, B. (2020). Imagined communities (Rev. ed.). Verso. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060963-46
Blommaert, J. (2021). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.
Ergashev R., Rahmatullayev A. Language policy and interethnic relations: theory and practice. – T.: Science, 2021. – 204 p.
Fishman, J. A. (2020). Language and national identity. Journal of Multilingual Studies, 4(1), 1–15.
Fishman, J.A. (1999). Handbook of Language & Ethnic Identity. Oxford University Press.
Gafaranga, J. (2021). Language and social cohesion. Sociolinguistic Studies, 15(3), 355–371.
Grin, F. (2020). Language policy and economics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, 321–340.
Hornberger, N. (2020). Indigenous and national languages. Language Policy, 19(4), 451–470.
Karimov I.A. High spirituality is an invincible force. – T.: Ma’naviyat, 2008. – 176 p.
Kuchkarova G. State language and interethnic relations: socio-political approaches. – T.: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, 2017. – 128 p.
Kurbanova M. State language is the basis of national unity. // Journal “Social Sciences”, 2023, No. 2. – P. 45–49.
Kymlicka, W. (2021). Multicultural citizenship revisited. Ethnicities, 21(3), 369–388.
Laitin, D. (2020). Language and political stability. World Politics, 72(2), 189–223.
Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On the State Language”. // “Xalq so‘zi” newspaper, October 21, 1989.
May, S. (2021). Language and minority rights. Routledge.
Mirziyoyev, S. (2020). Address to Oliy Majlis. Government of Uzbekistan.
Pavlenko, A. (2022). Language and citizenship. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(2), 161–180.
Ricento, T. (2020). Language policy and planning. Wiley.
Shozimova M. Language and intercultural dialogue: the experience of Uzbekistan. // Journal "Language and Society", 2022, No. 3. – P. 33–38.
Shozimova, M. (2022). Language and civic unity. Language and Society, 3, 33–38.
Smagulova J. Language Policies of Central Asian States and their Impact on Interethnic Relations ns. // Central Asian Survey, 2020, Vol. 39(4), pp. 501–517.
Smagulova, J. (2020). Language policies in Central Asia. Central Asian Survey, 39(4), 501–517.
Spolsky, B. (2021). Language management. Cambridge University Press.
Tollefson, J. (2020). Language and power. Applied Linguistics, 41(1), 1–20.
UNESCO. (2023). Languages and social inclusion. UNESCO.
UNESCO. Language Vitality and Endangerment. Document submitted to the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Program Safeguarding Endangered Languages. Paris, 2003.
Wright, S. (2021). Language policy and language planning. Palgrave.
Yusupov, A. (2024). State language reforms in Uzbekistan. Uzbek Political Studies, 5(1), 61–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52773/tsuull.uzlc.2024.1/ZHQQ3943
Zhernova, E. (2022). Language ideology and integration. Journal of Ethnopolitics, 21(4), 423–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2021.1901380




