Discourse Structure and Linguistic Features of Academic Textbooks: A Qualitative Analysis

Authors

  • Dwi Elfi Notalenta Gea Universitas Nias
  • Juni For Enjelina Bate’e Universitas Nias
  • Epifania Anggun Yunita Harita Universitas Nias
  • Afore Tahir Harefa Universitas Nias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jpbi.v3i2.2464

Keywords:

Textbook Discourse, Cohesion and Coherence, Syntactic Complexity, Nominalization, Psycholinguistics

Abstract

This study examines the discourse structure and linguistic features of selected chapters in Psycholinguistics: Introduction and Applications (second edition) by Menn and Dronkers. Academic textbooks play a central role in shaping how disciplinary knowledge is organized and understood, yet relatively little attention has been paid to how psycholinguistics textbooks manage structure and language complexity for learners. The objective of this study is to identify organizational patterns, cohesion and coherence strategies, and indicators of linguistic complexity in the textbook. Using a qualitative discourse-analytic approach, purposively selected introductory and methods chapters were analyzed. Units of analysis included discourse moves, paragraphs, and sentences. The study combined close reading with analytical categories drawn from register and genre studies, focusing on rhetorical organization, cohesive devices, and syntactic and lexical features. The findings reveal a clear chapter-level structure resembling the Introduction–Method–Results–Discussion pattern, adapted for instructional purposes. The text makes frequent use of cohesive ties such as reference, conjunction, and lexical repetition to guide explanation. It also demonstrates dense noun phrases, nominalization, and specialized terminology that compress information while maintaining pedagogical clarity. The study concludes that psycholinguistics textbooks balance informational density with instructional accessibility, offering implications for textbook development and academic reading instruction.

References

Abdi, T. M., & Johnson, M. D. (2023). Exploring new insights into the role of cohesive devices in written academic genres. Assessing Writing, 57, 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100749

Alasmary, A. (2025). Discourse-organising lexical bundles in academic law textbooks: a corpus-based analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), ISSN 2662-9992, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04995-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04995-6

Angermuller, J. (2024). Representing Discourse Studies: The unequal actors of an international and multidisciplinary field. Routledge Handbook of Cultural Discourse Studies, 24-44, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003207245-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003207245-4

Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2016). Using Grammatical Features for Automatic Register Identification in an Unrestricted Corpus of Documents from the Open Web. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in Linguistics and Communication Science, 2(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1558/jrds.v2i1.27637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/jrds.v2i1.27637

Busiło, S. (2024). Describing mental operations and research process in Polish scientific discourse from a glottodidactic perspective (about Polish Academic Word List concept). Poradnik Jezykowy, 819(10), 64-81, ISSN 0551-5343, https://doi.org/10.33896/PorJ.2024.10.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33896/PorJ.2024.10.4

Casal, J. E., Lu, X., Qiu, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Syntactic complexity across academic research article part-genres: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100996

Chen, D. (2026). The Role of Critical Discourse Analysis in Promoting Epistemological Diversity in EAL Learning: A Case Study on Canadian International Students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics United Kingdom, 36(1), 62-74, ISSN 0802-6106, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12706

Chyad, A.A. (2025). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Legitimation in English Textbooks’ Treatment of Language Standardization. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(10), 3457-3463, ISSN 1799-2591, https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1510.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1510.34

Conrad, S. (2015). Register variation. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics (1st ed., pp. 309–329). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377.018

Devitt, A. J. (2015). Genre performances: John Swales’ Genre Analysis and rhetorical linguistic genre studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.008

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2019). Academic Discourse and Global Publishing: Disciplinary Persuasion in Changing Times (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433962

Jašić, O. (2025). The Notion Of Myth In The Philosophical Discourse Of Milenko M. Perović: Religiological Observations. Journal of Philosophy Arhe, 22(44), 29-47, ISSN 1820-0958, https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2025.44.29-47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2025.44.29-47

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu

Menn, L., & Dronkers, N. F. (2017). Psycholinguistics: Introduction and applications (2nd ed.). (2nd ed.).

Narayanan, A. (2024). Processes and Protocols of Discourse Oriented Pedagogy Towards Resisting Linguistic Imperialism. Critical Issues in Elt, 89-102, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003538479-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003538479-7

Phuong-Mai, M.N. (2025). Intercultural Communication: An Interdisciplinary Approach: When Neurons, Genes, and Evolution Joined the Discourse. Intercultural Communication an Interdisciplinary Approach When Neurons Genes and Evolution Joined the Discourse, 1-376, https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985414

Rahman, M.A. (2024). An Argumentative Discourse Analysis Of The Newspaper Editorial “The 9/30 Tragedy”. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(1), https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.956

To, V. (2018). Linguistic Complexity Analysis: A Case Study of Commonly-Used Textbooks in Vietnam. Sage Open, 8(3), 2158244018787586. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018787586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018787586

Wu, X., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L. (2020). Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798

Zhou, Q. (2024). A Corpus-Based Study of Lexical Chunks in Chinese Academic Discourse: Extraction, Classification, and Application. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, 14515, 257-273, ISSN 0302-9743, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0586-3_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0586-3_21

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Gea, D., Bate’e, J., Harita, E., & Harefa, A. (2026). Discourse Structure and Linguistic Features of Academic Textbooks: A Qualitative Analysis. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 3(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jpbi.v3i2.2464

Issue

Section

Articles