Professional “acme” – As a Factor for Developing Professional Identity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/ptk.v2i3.1605Keywords:
Acmeology, Professional , Professional Identification, Professional Development, Personal Growth, Socio-Psychological FactorsAbstract
This study aims to examine the concept of "professional acme" as a significant determinant in the formation of professional identity among educators. Employing a theoretical and conceptual literature review methodology, the paper explores various stages of professional development and integrates psychological and pedagogical theories, including acmeology and identity formation frameworks. The results indicate that achieving "acme”, the peak of professional excellence requires continuous learning, intrinsic motivation, mentoring, and psychological resilience. Teachers who reach this stage demonstrate stronger identity, greater instructional impact, and contribute more significantly to educational quality and student development. The study recommends teacher education programs to integrate reflective practice, value formation, and mentorship structures to nurture professional maturity
References
Abdusamiyev, D. (2024). Developing dynamics of teacher’s professional identity. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(2), 9–9.
Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.
Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601–616.
Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF5313 dated January 25, 2018 “On measures to radically improve the system of general secondary, secondary specialized and vocational education”.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
Khrypko, S., Binkivska, K., Klose, R., Martsinko, N., Kuznietsova, I., Myroniuk, L., & Patlaichuk, O. (2025). Acmeology of education as a determinant of the sustainable development concept: Faith vs fear. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(1), 373–373.
Korshunova, I., Pinaev, S., & Tsaregorodtseva, S. (2020). Professionalism of activity: Acmeological aspect. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 87, p. 00102). EDP Sciences.
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97.
Mahajan, R., Goyal, P. K., & Singh, T. (2022). Professional identity formation of medical educators: A thematic analysis of enabling factors and competencies needed. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 12(3), 189–195.
Mahkamov, U., Tillaboeva, N., & Tillaboeva, Sh. (2003). Pedagogical skills. Textbook.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
Oralbaevna, D. A. (2021). Acmelogical mechanisms of professional and creative development of the future teacher. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(12), 823–827.
Pedagogy (Pod. ed. P. I. Pidkasistogo). (2003). Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii.
Pluzhnikova, L. A. (2012). Psychological and acmeological factors of personal and professional development. Перспективы науки, 252.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Дубинина, О., Игнатюк, О., & Середа, Н. (2020). Pedagogical acme-technology of formation of responsibility among leader-professionals during the process of professional education. Теорія і практика управління соціальними системами: філософія, психологія, педагогіка, соціологія(4), 3–13.